UCLA’s scheduling of Nevada a puzzling one

by UCLA

141545.SP.0927.uclaftbl.30.LSDuring the latter weeks of spring, it is quite common for college football coaches across the country to fill out the remaining open dates on their non-conference schedules. Like his colleagues, UCLA’s Rick Neuheisel is putting the finishing touches on future schedules with an agreement to face the Nevada Wolfpack.

According to the University of Nevada Cary Groth, Neuheisel and UCLA have agreeed to play Nevada three times in upcoming years, including one trip to Reno.

Nevada will travel to Pasadena to face the Bruins on August 31, 2013 and again on September 19, 2015. The Bruins will then come to Nevada’s Mackay Stadium on September 17, 2016.

Yesterday, Neuheisel released a statement addressing the scheduling of Nevada:

“Nevada is one of the top programs in the Western Athletic Conference,” said head coach Rick Neuheisel. “In addition, two of the three games are at the Rose Bowl. Reno is an easy trip from Los Angeles, so hopefully, a lot of Bruin fans will go to support us.”

After reading this, my question is why. Why should UCLA, a supposedly upper-echelon Pac-10 program, have to travel all the way to Reno as part of a home-and-home series? I have heard of lot Bruin fans explaining that the move is designed to help Neuheisel and company do a better job at targeting local Nevada. But, common. When has the state of Nevada ever been a hotbed for recruits. If they were really interested in recruiting, than why didn’t the Bruins schedule a home-and-home with SMU, located in Dallas, Texas; or even Central Florida, located in Orlando, Florida. Both schools, while non-BCS programs like Nevada, are at least located in pristine recruiting areas.

But recruiting aside, there is still little upside in traveling all the way to Reno. UCLA is playing a team that will be far more excited to play a BCS conference than they will be playing a team from the WAC. If UCLA does win the game, it’s no big deal. Just a win over Nevada-Reno. If they lose, it’s an upset and a stain on the program. I seed little upside in the decision to schedule Nevada.

Tags:
Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Mike,
You want to know why UCLA is traveling to Houston? Because Texas happens to have a ton of high school football players. Sorry, but Nevada doesn't. It has nothing to do with the size of the stadium. It's about tapping into the local market for recruits. There are more gems to be found in the Houston area than there are in Reno. Sorry, but it's true. Look at the listings on either Rivals.com or Scout.com.

As for SEC teams traveling to Reno, it's never going to happen. Hardly any SEC travel outside of the south. Remember, Georgia's trip to ASU last year was their first game west of the Mississippi River since the 70s. The SEC hardly even wants to come out and play Pac-10 schools so what makes you think they'll want to place a school from the WAC?

You make the assumption that Nevada is going to be the same program 4 to 7 years from now. You also act as if you'll be the first big reputation school to play at Nevada. Texas Tech was theere last year and Mizzou this year. Arizona, Oregon, Washington and one other TBD Pac-10 school will play there in the next 7 years, not to mention some SEC schools that are being negotiated.

You were willing to travel to the Las Vegas Bowl to play a MWC team, right? That stadium isn't much bigger than Nevada's. You also have a 2 for 1 with Houston in the next few years. Now Houston's stadium is a tiny old dump. I give props to the UCLA staff for mixing it up and doing something different.

Depending on who else they schedule, this really isn't any different than doing the same thing with Utah or BYU. It's only a problem if they play another crappy school in the same year. But they usually have a BCS conference school on the non-conference schedule, so I imagine they will in those years as well.